How to pass Isaca COBIT-Design-and-Implementation exam with the help of dumps?
DumpsPool provides you the finest quality resources you’ve been looking for to no avail. So, it's due time you stop stressing and get ready for the exam. Our Online Test Engine provides you with the guidance you need to pass the certification exam. We guarantee top-grade results because we know we’ve covered each topic in a precise and understandable manner. Our expert team prepared the latest Isaca COBIT-Design-and-Implementation Dumps to satisfy your need for training. Plus, they are in two different formats: Dumps PDF and Online Test Engine.
How Do I Know Isaca COBIT-Design-and-Implementation Dumps are Worth it?
Did we mention our latest COBIT-Design-and-Implementation Dumps PDF is also available as Online Test Engine? And that’s just the point where things start to take root. Of all the amazing features you are offered here at DumpsPool, the money-back guarantee has to be the best one. Now that you know you don’t have to worry about the payments. Let us explore all other reasons you would want to buy from us. Other than affordable Real Exam Dumps, you are offered three-month free updates.
You can easily scroll through our large catalog of certification exams. And, pick any exam to start your training. That’s right, DumpsPool isn’t limited to just Isaca Exams. We trust our customers need the support of an authentic and reliable resource. So, we made sure there is never any outdated content in our study resources. Our expert team makes sure everything is up to the mark by keeping an eye on every single update. Our main concern and focus are that you understand the real exam format. So, you can pass the exam in an easier way!
IT Students Are Using our ISACA COBIT2019Design and Implementation certificate Dumps Worldwide!
It is a well-established fact that certification exams can’t be conquered without some help from experts. The point of using ISACA COBIT2019Design and Implementation certificate Practice Question Answers is exactly that. You are constantly surrounded by IT experts who’ve been through you are about to and know better. The 24/7 customer service of DumpsPool ensures you are in touch with these experts whenever needed. Our 100% success rate and validity around the world, make us the most trusted resource candidates use. The updated Dumps PDF helps you pass the exam on the first attempt. And, with the money-back guarantee, you feel safe buying from us. You can claim your return on not passing the exam.
How to Get COBIT-Design-and-Implementation Real Exam Dumps?
Getting access to the real exam dumps is as easy as pressing a button, literally! There are various resources available online, but the majority of them sell scams or copied content. So, if you are going to attempt the COBIT-Design-and-Implementation exam, you need to be sure you are buying the right kind of Dumps. All the Dumps PDF available on DumpsPool are as unique and the latest as they can be. Plus, our Practice Question Answers are tested and approved by professionals. Making it the top authentic resource available on the internet. Our expert has made sure the Online Test Engine is free from outdated & fake content, repeated questions, and false plus indefinite information, etc. We make every penny count, and you leave our platform fully satisfied!
Which of the following is the BEST approach when developing an EGIT implementation program plan?
A. Process improvement objectives should not be changed or updated.
B. Projects that are high-benefit and relatively easy to implement should be selected first. C. All projects should be given the same value and consideration for implementation. D. Unapproved projects should not be recorded or considered.
Answer: B Explanation: COBIT 2019 Implementation Guide, Chapter 5:This
chapter outlines the importance of prioritizing projects that can
deliver quick wins to maintain stakeholder support and demonstrate the
value of the governance framework.COBIT 2019 Framework: Governance and Management Objectives, BAI01 (Managed Programs):This objective discusses the prioritization of initiatives based on their potential benefits and implementation feasibility. By
focusing on high-benefit, easy-to-implement projects, enterprises can
create a solid foundation for more challenging initiatives and ensure
continuous progress in their governance implementation efforts.
When developing an EGIT (Enterprise
Governance of IT) implementation program plan, the best approach is to
select projects that are high-benefit and relatively easy to implement
first. This approach, often referred to as "low-hanging fruit," helps
build momentum, demonstrate value quickly, and secure buy-in from
stakeholders for more complex initiatives.References in COBIT 2019 Design and Implementation:
Question # 2
I&T-related issues should be considered as part of the design factors for a governance system in order to manage:
A. risks that could materialize.
B. risks that have already materialized. C. risks that have a high probability. D. risks that have a high impact.
Answer: A Explanation: COBIT 2019 Design Guide, Chapter 2:This
chapter explains the importance of considering I&T-related issues
as design factors to address potential risks that could impact the
governance system.COBIT 2019 Framework: Governance and Management Objectives, APO12 (Managed Risk):This objective emphasizes the need to identify and manage risks that could affect IT and business processes. By
addressing potential risks through the design of the governance system,
enterprises can better prepare for and mitigate adverse events,
ensuring smoother and more effective IT operations.
I&T-related issues should be
considered as part of the design factors for a governance system in
order to manage risks that could materialize. This proactive approach
allows the enterprise to identify and mitigate potential risks before
they occur, enhancing the overall resilience and effectiveness of the
governance system.References in COBIT 2019 Design and Implementation:
Question # 3
When is it MOST important for an enterprise to apply the full governance
design workflow and carefully consider all design factors?
A. When the enterprise requires a broad, holistic, and comprehensive view of its governance system
B. When key stakeholders cannot agree on governance objectives, strategy, and priorities C. When the enterprise needs to focus on one key initiative requiring a major investment D. When the enterprise must meet complex regulatory requirements for which the enterprise is not currently in compliance
Answer: A Explanation: COBIT 2019 Design Guide, Chapter 2:This
chapter elaborates on how design factors influence the creation of a
tailored governance system that is comprehensive and aligns with the
enterprise's unique context.COBIT 2019 Framework: Introduction and Methodology, Chapter 4:This
chapter discusses the importance of a holistic approach in establishing
governance and the necessity of considering all design factors to
create a system that encompasses all aspects of enterprise IT and
business objectives.COBIT 2019 Implementation Guide, Chapter 3:This
chapter provides steps for implementing a comprehensive governance
system, emphasizing the importance of a full governance design workflow
to achieve a thorough and effective governance structure. By
following the full governance design workflow, enterprises can ensure
that their governance framework is not only comprehensive but also
customized to address specific needs, thereby improving alignment,
efficiency, and compliance across the organization. Applying the full governance design
workflow and carefully considering all design factors is most important
when an enterprise requires a broad, holistic, and comprehensive view of
its governance system. This scenario is where the entire spectrum of
the governance framework needs to be analyzed and tailored to ensure it
meets the enterprise's overall strategic goals and operational needs.References in COBIT 2019 Design and Implementation:
Question # 4
What is the FINAL step in governance system design?
A. Define target capability levels for the most critical objectives.
B. Review governance objectives that correspond to high compliance requirements. C. Reconcile inherent priority conflicts. D. Refine the scope of the governance system.
Answer: C Explanation: COBIT 2019 Design Guide, Chapter 5:Emphasizes the importance of addressing and reconciling priority conflicts to finalize the governance system design.COBIT 2019 Implementation Guide, Chapter 7:Discusses
the necessity of resolving conflicts and aligning objectives as part of
the final steps in the governance system design process. By
reconciling priority conflicts, the enterprise ensures that the
governance system is practical, balanced, and capable of delivering the
desired outcomes.
The final step in governance system
design is to reconcile inherent priority conflicts. This ensures that
all conflicting priorities among stakeholders are addressed and resolved
to create a cohesive and aligned governance system.The
reconciliation of inherent priority conflicts is a critical final step
to ensure that the designed governance system can effectively meet the
needs and expectations of all stakeholders. This involves negotiating
and balancing different priorities to ensure that the governance
objectives are achievable and aligned with the enterprise’s strategic
goals.COBIT 2019 Framework References:
Question # 5
Which of the following MOST effectively addresses cultural aspects of a
major international IT initiative that impacts the entire enterprise?
A. Continuous improvement
B. Risk assessments C. Change enablement D. Program management
Answer: C Explanation: COBIT 2019 Framework: Governance and Management Objectives, BAI05 (Managed Organizational Change):This objective focuses on managing organizational change effectively, including cultural aspects.COBIT 2019 Implementation Guide, Chapter 4:This
chapter emphasizes the importance of change management practices in
addressing cultural aspects and ensuring successful implementation of
major initiatives. Effective change enablement considers the
cultural context, helping to align stakeholder expectations and promote
acceptance and adoption of new initiatives across the enterprise.
Change enablement most effectively
addresses the cultural aspects of a major international IT initiative
that impacts the entire enterprise. It ensures that changes are managed
smoothly and that the organization's culture is considered and aligned
with the new initiatives.References in COBIT 2019 Design and Implementation:
Question # 6
When considering the IT implementation methods design factor, and the
design factor value is agile, which of the following should be a
management objective priority?
A. Managed data (AP014)
B. Managed enterprise architecture C. Managed risk D. Managed IT changes
Answer: D Explanation: COBIT 2019 Framework: Governance and Management Objectives, BAI06 Managed IT Changes:This
objective focuses on managing all IT changes in a controlled manner,
ensuring minimal disruption and alignment with business goals.COBIT 2019 Design Guide, Chapter 3:Discusses
the importance of aligning management objectives with specific design
factors, such as IT implementation methods like Agile. By
prioritizing "Managed IT changes," the enterprise can ensure that its
agile implementation remains effective and aligned with overall
governance objectives.
When the IT implementation methods
design factor value is agile, the management objective priority should
be "Managed IT changes." Agile methodologies involve frequent changes
and iterations, making effective change management crucial for success.Agile
methodologies emphasize flexibility, iterative development, and rapid
response to change. As a result, managing IT changes becomes a priority
to ensure that changes are systematically controlled, risks are
mitigated, and alignment with business goals is maintained.COBIT 2019 Framework References:
Question # 7
Which of the following needs to be resolved when finalizing the initial governance design?
A. Misaligned enterprise and IT goals
B. Budgeted versus actual resources C. Objectives exceeding enterprise appetite D. Conflicting inputs and priorities
Answer: D Explanation: Stakeholder Alignment:Ensuring that all stakeholders are on the same page regarding priorities and objectives.Conflict Resolution:Addressing and resolving any discrepancies or conflicts in inputs to ensure a consistent and aligned governance system.Prioritization:Establishing clear priorities to guide decision-making and resource allocation. COBIT 2019 Framework References: COBIT 2019 Design Guide, Chapter 4:Discusses
the importance of resolving conflicting inputs and establishing a
cohesive governance framework that aligns with enterprise priorities.COBIT 2019 Framework: Governance and Management Objectives:Emphasizes the need for alignment between IT and enterprise goals, requiring the resolution of any conflicting priorities. Resolving
conflicting inputs and priorities ensures that the governance system is
well-aligned and effective in achieving enterprise goals. The initial governance design
process involves gathering inputs from various stakeholders, including
business units, IT, and external partners. These inputs can sometimes
conflict, and it is crucial to resolve these conflicts to create a
unified governance system that supports enterprise objectives.Key Steps:
Question # 8
Which of the following is a KEY change enablement task that must be
completed during the driver identification phase of an IT initiative?
A. Identify the business and governance drivers.
B. Define high-level improvement targets. C. Assign high-level roles and responsibilities. D. Establish urgency for the changes needed.
Answer: A Explanation: COBIT 2019 Design Guide, Chapter 2:Highlights
the importance of identifying business and governance drivers as part
of the design factors that influence the governance system.COBIT 2019 Implementation Guide, Chapter 4:Discusses the process of identifying and analyzing drivers to ensure that IT initiatives are aligned with enterprise goals. By
identifying these drivers, the enterprise can ensure that the IT
initiative is aligned with its strategic and governance objectives,
thereby facilitating successful change enablement.
A key change enablement task that
must be completed during the driver identification phase of an IT
initiative is to identify the business and governance drivers.
Understanding these drivers isessential for aligning IT initiatives with
the strategic objectives and governance needs of the enterprise.Identifying
business and governance drivers involves understanding the fundamental
factors that influence the direction and priorities of IT initiatives.
These drivers include strategic goals, regulatory requirements, market
conditions, and internal organizational needs.COBIT 2019 Framework References:
Question # 9
It is CRITICAL to perform a due diligence review following which type of event?
A. Shifts in the market or economy
B. Merger, acquisition, or divestitureCNew business strategy or priority C. External consultant assessment
Answer: B Explanation: COBIT 2019 Framework: Governance and Management Objectives, APO12 (Managed Risk):This
objective emphasizes the importance of risk management during
significant organizational changes, such as mergers and acquisitions.COBIT 2019 Implementation Guide, Chapter 3:This
chapter outlines the need for due diligence in evaluating potential
risks and ensuring that governance and management practices are adapted
to new organizational contexts. A due diligence review
ensures that all aspects of the merger, acquisition, or divestiture are
carefully assessed, mitigating risks and supporting a smooth transition.
It is critical to perform a due
diligence review following a merger, acquisition, or divestiture. Such
events involve significant changes to the organizational structure,
assets, and operations, necessitating thorough review to identify risks,
synergies, and compliance issues.References in COBIT 2019 Design and Implementation:
Question # 10
Which of the following is the BEST approach to resolve competing priorities for the design of a governance system?
A. Base the design on initiatives that will yield the most immediate benefit for the enterprise.
B. Defer to risk and assurance management to determine priorities. C. Utilize generic, pre-programmed computations to generate quantitative priorities for governance objectives. D. Include all key stakeholders in the discussion of the design.
Answer: D Explanation: COBIT 2019 Framework: Governance and Management Objectives, MEA04 (Managed Stakeholder Engagement):This objective emphasizes the importance of engaging stakeholders to ensure that their needs and priorities are addressed.COBIT 2019 Implementation Guide, Chapter 3:This
chapter discusses the value of stakeholder involvement in the
governance design process to achieve consensus and align priorities. Involving
key stakeholders in the discussion helps to balance different
priorities and ensures that the governance system design reflects a
broad range of insights and objectives.
The best approach to resolving
competing priorities for the design of a governance system is to include
all key stakeholders in the discussion of the design. This approach
ensures that diverse perspectives are considered and that priorities are
aligned with the overall strategic goals of the enterprise.References in COBIT 2019 Design and Implementation:
Question # 11
When assessing the current state of I&T, a continual improvement task includes:
A. developing metrics to monitor l&T performance.
B. identifying potential process improvements. C. identifying key enterprise and supporting alignment goals. D. raising executive awareness of IT and the value of EGIT.
Answer: B Explanation: COBIT 2019 Framework: Governance and Management Objectives, BAI10 (Managed Continuous Improvement):This
objective focuses on the importance of continually assessing and
improving IT processes to enhance performance and value delivery.COBIT 2019 Implementation Guide, Chapter 5:This
chapter discusses the need for continuous improvement initiatives,
including the identification of potential process improvements to
optimize IT performance. By continually identifying and
implementing process improvements, enterprises can ensure that their IT
functions remain competitive and capable of supporting evolving business
needs.
When assessing the current state of
I&T, a continual improvement task includes identifying potential
process improvements. This task is essential for ensuring that IT
processes remain efficient, effective, and aligned with business goals.References in COBIT 2019 Design and Implementation:
Question # 12
Which of the following should be a KEY consideration for an enterprise
when refining the scope of the governance system in the third stage of
the Governance System Design Workflow?
A. Enterprise strategy
B. Current l&T-related risks C. The risk profile D. Compliance requirements
Answer: A Explanation: Enterprise Strategy (Option A):
The primary consideration is ensuring that the governance system aligns
with and supports the enterprise strategy. This involves understanding
the strategic objectives, goals, and priorities of the organization and
ensuring that the governance system is designed to help achieve these
strategic aims. This alignment ensures that IT governance is not just a
compliance exercise but a strategic enabler for business success.Current I&T-Related Risks (Option B):
While important, this factor is more about addressing immediate
operational concerns and is typically considered earlier in the process
to identify and mitigate significant risks.The Risk Profile (Option C):
Understanding the overall risk profile and risk appetite of the
enterprise is crucial for shaping the governance system but is not the
primary focus in the third stage. This aspect is usually addressed in
earlier stages to ensure that the governance framework adequately covers
risk management.Compliance Requirements (Option D):
Ensuring compliance is always a critical consideration, but like risk
management, it is typically addressed earlier in the designprocess.
Compliance requirements should be integrated into the governance
framework but are not the key driver at the refining stage. Thus, the correct answer isA. Enterprise strategy.
By focusing on the enterprise strategy during the third stage of the
Governance System Design Workflow, the governance system can be refined
to support strategic initiatives, thereby ensuring that IT governance
contributes directly to achieving business goals.References: ISACA. COBIT 2019 Design Guide: Designing an Information and Technology Governance Solution. ISACA.ISACA. COBIT 2019 Framework: Introduction and Methodology. ISACA.
In the third stage of the
Governance System Design Workflow, refining the scope of the governance
system involves aligning it closely with the overall strategic direction
and objectives of the enterprise. COBIT 2019 emphasizes that the
governance system should support the enterprise's strategy to ensure
that I&T-related activities contribute effectively to achieving
business goals.Key considerations for refining the scope include:
Question # 13
Which of the following would BEST enable the prioritization of governance objectives?
A. The IT strategic plan
B. A matrixed scoring methodology C. The enterprises risk tolerance D. Expected performance outcomes
Answer: B Explanation: IT Strategic Plan (Option A): The
IT strategic plan outlines the strategic direction and objectives of IT
within the organization. While it provides guidance on long-term goals
and initiatives, it does not offer a detailed mechanism for prioritizing
specific governance objectives. Matrixed Scoring Methodology (Option B): A
matrixed scoring methodology allows the organization to evaluate
governance objectives against a set of predefined criteria such as
strategic alignment, risk impact, resource availability, and expected
benefits. This methodology helps in objectively assessing and comparing
the importance and urgency of different governance objectives. By
assigning scores to each criterion, organizations can create a
prioritized list based on overall scores, ensuring that the most
critical and impactful objectives are addressed first.This
approach is comprehensive and takes into account multiple factors,
providing a balanced and transparent means of prioritizing objectives.
It enables decision-makers to justify their choices and ensures that
prioritization is aligned with the organization's strategic goals and
risk profile. Enterprise's Risk Tolerance (Option C): The
enterprise's risk tolerance is an important factor in governance
decisions, as it defines the level of risk the organization is willing
to accept. However, while it influences prioritization, it is not a
standalone methodology for prioritizing governance objectives. Risk
tolerance must be considered within a broader context of criteria, which
a matrixed scoring methodology can effectively encompass. Expected Performance Outcomes (Option D): Expected
performance outcomes are crucial for evaluating the success of
governance initiatives, but they do not provide a methodology for
prioritizing objectives. They are one of the factors that can be
included in a matrixed scoring methodology to assess the potential
impact and value of each objective. Conclusion:The correct answer isB. A matrixed scoring methodology.
This method provides a robust, multi-criteria approach to prioritizing
governance objectives, ensuring that decisions are made based on a
balanced consideration of various relevant factors.References: ISACA. COBIT 2019 Framework: Governance and Management Objectives. ISACA.ISACA. COBIT 2019 Design Guide: Designing an Information and Technology Governance Solution. ISACA.
In COBIT 2019, the prioritization of
governance objectives is essential to ensure that the most critical
aspects of IT governance receive the necessary focus and resources. A
matrixed scoring methodology is considered the best enabler for
prioritizing governance objectives because it provides a structured,
systematic, and quantifiable approach to evaluating and ranking various
governance objectives based on multiple criteria.Detailed Explanation with References:
Question # 14
Which function within the IT corporate structure is responsible for
classifying information using an agreed-upon classification scheme for a
new data collection system?
A. Information security
B. Information privacy C. .IT governance D. Enterprise architecture
Answer: A Explanation: COBIT 2019 Framework: Governance and Management Objectives, APO13 (Managed Security):This
objective outlines the responsibilities of the information security
function, which includes defining and implementing information
classification schemes.COBIT 2019 Implementation Guide, Chapter 3:This
chapter details how information security policies and practices should
be established, including the classification of information assets.COBIT 2019 Framework: Deliver, Service and Support (DSS05, Managed Security Services):This
objective highlights the role of information security in managing
security services, including data classification and protection
measures. By classifying information, the information
security function ensures that data is adequately protected against
unauthorized access and breaches, adhering to compliance requirements
and supporting the overall security posture of the enterprise.
The function within the IT corporate
structure responsible for classifying information using an agreed-upon
classification scheme for a new data collection system is the
Information Security function. Information security ensures that data is
properly classified to protect it according to its sensitivity and
criticality.References in COBIT 2019 Design and Implementation:
Question # 15
At which stage of the governance system design flow are design factors translated into governance and management priorities?
A. Concluding the governance system design
B. Understanding the enterprise strategy C. Determining the initial scope D. Refining the scope
Answer: D Explanation: Concluding the Governance System Design (Option A): This
stage involves finalizing and approving the design of the governance
system. By this point, the design factors have already been considered
and translated into actionable priorities. Understanding the Enterprise Strategy (Option B): At
this stage, the focus is on understanding the enterprise's strategic
direction and objectives. While it is crucial to gather this
understanding to inform the governance system design, the actual
translation of design factors into governance and management priorities
occurs later. Determining the Initial Scope (Option C): This
stage involves setting the preliminary boundaries and focus areas for
the governance system. It identifies the broad areas that need
governance attention but does not yet translate specific design factors
into detailed priorities. Refining the Scope (Option D): During
this phase, the initial scope is refined based on a deeper analysis of
the design factors. It is at this stage that the design factors are
critically analyzed and translated into specific governance and
management priorities. This phase ensures that the governance system is
tailored to the unique needs of the enterprise and aligns with its
strategic goals, risk profile, and other key considerations.According
to the COBIT 2019 Design Guide, refining the scope involves using the
identified design factors to make informed decisions about where to
focus governance efforts and how to prioritize various governance and
management activities. This ensures a targeted and effective governance
system. Conclusion:The correct answer isD. Refining the scope.
In this phase, design factors are systematically translated into
specific governance and management priorities, ensuring that the
governance system is precisely aligned with the enterprise's needs and
objectives.References: ISACA. COBIT 2019 Design Guide: Designing an Information and Technology Governance Solution. ISACA.ISACA. COBIT 2019 Framework: Introduction and Methodology. ISACA.
In the COBIT 2019 Governance System
Design Workflow, design factors are essential elements that influence
the tailoring and implementation of a governance system. These design
factors include elements such as enterprise strategy, goals, risk
profile, compliance requirements, and more. The stage where these design
factors are translated into specific governance and management
priorities is during the "Refining the Scope" phase.Detailed Explanation with References:
Question # 16
In which of the following phases should quick wins be implemented in order to build credibility?
A. What needs to be done?
B. Where do we want to be? C. How do we get there? D. Where are we now?
Answer: C Explanation: What needs to be done? (Option A): This
phase involves understanding the governance requirements, identifying
gaps, and determining the necessary governance components. While
important for planning, this phase is more about identifying needs
rather than implementing solutions. Where do we want to be? (Option B): This
phase focuses on defining the target state of the governance system,
setting goals, and envisioning the desired outcomes. It is more
strategic and future-oriented, outlining what the organization aims to
achieve but not yet focusing on implementation. How do we get there? (Option C): This
phase is about developing and executing the implementation plan to
reach the desired state. It involves detailing the actions, resources,
and timelines required to achieve the governance objectives.
Implementing quick wins during this phase is crucial because it helps to
demonstrate progress, build momentum, and validate the approach taken.
Early successes in this phase can boost confidence and support for the
broader governance initiative.According to the COBIT 2019
Implementation Guide, achieving and demonstrating quick wins during this
phase is critical to maintaining stakeholder engagement and
demonstrating the value of the governance improvements. Where are we now? (Option D): This
phase involves assessing the current state of the governance system,
identifying existing issues, and understanding the baseline. It is more
diagnostic and evaluative, laying the groundwork for planning but not
yet focusing on implementation. Conclusion:The correct answer isC. How do we get there?.
Implementing quick wins during this phase helps to build credibility
and support for the governance program by showing early, tangible
improvements and demonstrating the feasibility and benefits of the
proposed governance changes.References: ISACA. COBIT 2019 Implementation Guide: Implementing and Optimizing an Information and Technology Governance Solution. ISACA.ISACA. COBIT 2019 Framework: Introduction and Methodology. ISACA.
In the COBIT 2019 implementation
lifecycle, quick wins are essential for demonstrating early success and
building credibility for the governance initiative. Implementing quick
wins provides tangible results that can help secure stakeholder support
and buy-in for the ongoing governance program. The appropriate phase for
implementing quick wins is during the phase where the organization
outlines and starts to execute the plan for achieving its governance
objectives.Detailed Explanation with References:
Question # 17
In which of the following phases should long-term targets be adjusted based on experience?
A. How do we get there?
B. Where are we now? C. What needs to be done? D. Did we get there?
Answer: D Explanation: How do we get there? (Option A): This
phase focuses on developing and executing the plan to achieve the
governance objectives. It involves identifying the steps, resources, and
timeline needed to reach the desired state. While important for
planning, this phase is more about action and implementation rather than
evaluation and adjustment of long-term targets. Where are we now? (Option B): This
phase involves assessing the current state of the governance system,
identifying gaps, and understanding the baseline. It provides the
foundational information needed to plan improvements but does not
involve adjusting long-term targets. What needs to be done? (Option C): This
phase is concerned with identifying the specific actions and
initiatives required to address the gaps and achieve the governance
objectives. It involves planning and prioritizing activities but not the
evaluation and adjustment of long-term targets based on experience. Did we get there? (Option D): In
this phase, the enterprise evaluates the outcomes of the implemented
governance system against the set objectives and targets. It involves
assessing whether the desired goals were achieved and analyzing the
effectiveness of the governance practices. Based on this evaluation, the
organization can adjust long-term targets to better align with
practical experience, new insights, and evolving business needs. This
phase is critical for continuous improvement and ensuring that the
governance system remains relevant and effective over time.According
to the COBIT 2019 Implementation Guide, this phase includes reviewing
performance metrics, stakeholder feedback, and lessons learned from the
implementation process. These insights are then used to refine and
adjust long-term targets to improve future performance and outcomes. Conclusion:The correct answer isD. Did we get there?.
This phase involves evaluating the results of the governance
implementation, learning from the experience, and making necessary
adjustments to long-term targets to ensure continuous improvement and
alignment with the enterprise’s goals.References: ISACA. COBIT 2019 Implementation Guide: Implementing and Optimizing an Information and Technology Governance Solution. ISACA.ISACA. COBIT 2019 Framework: Introduction and Methodology. ISACA.
In the COBIT 2019
implementation lifecycle, the phase where long-term targets should be
adjusted based on experience is the evaluation phase, known as "Did we
get there?". This phase involves assessing the results of the
implemented governance and management practices to determine if the
objectives have been met and to identify areas for improvement.Detailed Explanation with References:
Question # 18
Which of the following stakeholders is responsible for creating or
updating EGIT objectives following the completion of the first iteration
of an EGIT program implementation life cycle?
A. IT managers and IT process owners
B. The CIO and business executives C. The risk and compliance function and IT audit D. The board of directors and the program steering committee
Answer: B Explanation: COBIT 2019 Implementation Guide, Chapter 7:Highlights the roles of senior management, including the CIO and business executives, in setting and updating EGIT objectives.COBIT 2019 Design Guide, Chapter 4:Emphasizes the importance of executive involvement in governance system design and iterative improvement. By
engaging the CIO and business executives in this process, the
enterprise ensures that EGIT objectives remain relevant and aligned with
overall business strategy.
The stakeholders responsible for
creating or updating EGIT objectives following the completion of the
first iteration of an EGIT program implementation life cycle are the CIO
and business executives. They have the strategic oversight and
authority to set and adjust objectives based on the initial outcomes and
evolving business needs.The CIO and business
executives play a critical role in ensuring that the EGIT (Enterprise
Governance of Information and Technology) objectives are aligned with
business strategy and goals. After the first iteration, their
involvement is crucial to review progress, adjust objectives, and ensure
continued alignment with enterprise priorities.COBIT 2019 Framework References:
Leave a comment
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *